Peer Review

• All members of the Editorial Board and referees are asked to declare any competing interests they may have in reviewing a manuscript.
• After submission of paper, Editorial Board will immediately examine if the paper respect the scientific standard of MJPH.
• Articles accepted by the Editorial Board will be sent to a 2 referees.
• Papers not succeeding to reach the scientific standards of the journal may be declined without further review.
• To give a rapid evaluation of the paper, authors have to suggest two potential reviewers experts in the field.
• Concerning articles that need revision, only the revised version can be considered for a further appraisal under the peer-review system.
• The Editorial Board in chief is responsible for the final selection of referees to conduct the peer-review process.
• Referees won’t be informed about the identity of the authors whose articles are subject to review.
• The names of referees will be anonymous to authors.
• Authors are invited to appeal to the Editorial Office, if they are not contented by the editorial decision about their manuscript. Editorial Board will be requested a second opinion.